Why cultural competency should be woven into rehab training
Natalie Mackenzie and Eky Popat of brain injury rehabilitation service BIS Services on managing the cultural challenges in community rehabilitation.
Back in 2011 one of our team asked why there was a significant lack of consideration towards cultural differences within brain injury rehabilitation. It was not the first time we’d heard this question, but it further sowed the seed for a topic that is persistent and pertinent within our working practices at BIS Services, and a matter for discussion and change that must continue throughout the field. Most certainly, recent years have seen an increase in consideration and discussion regarding cultural competency and its importance in rehabilitation, which is reassuring, although the se are still challenges that we must continually consider.The importance of identifying priorities in rehabilitation
After a life-changing injury, such as acquired brain injury, it can be tempting for the injured person and their loved ones to want to ensure that they get as much of the best quality rehabilitation that the state can provide or that money can buy, writes Irwin Mitchell's David Withers.
This is because it is generally accepted that the greatest recovery is made in the first few years, particularly in the case of acquired brain injury. When an individual sustains a traumatic brain injury, there are a range of disciplines that may need to be involved including, but not limited to: physiotherapy; occupational therapy; neuropsychology; neuro-psychiatry; neurology; neuro-surgery; dietician / nutritionist; speech and language therapy; personal trainer; counsellor; and support workers. The injured person’s passion for rehabilitation is absolutely vital. If and when that goes, it can be very difficult to regain that motivation. Mind-set in rehabilitation is critical.Case managers and lawyers – the power of collaboration amid Covid-19
The Covid-19 epidemic has had a disproportionate impact on societies most vulnerable, due to social, financial and medical needs, write legal executive Jack Sales and clinical case manager Alexandra Hitchcock...
With many clients falling into this category case managers and solicitors have needed to continue to work in a collaborative and responsive fashion in order to best respond to the clients’ changing needs. This is compounded when the client is not the only person in the household and their care team’s needs also need to be considered. Elderly family members and those with other medical conditions along with roommates working from home, children requiring home schooling and regular paid carers needing to self-isolate have made supporting clients’ needs more challenging.Changes to life expectancy…
By David Withers of Irwin Mitchell LLP.
In personal injury cases, lawyers use “The Actuarial Tables with explanatory notes for use in Personal Injury and Fatal Accident Cases”, otherwise known as the “Ogden Tables”. The tables can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ogden-tables-actuarial-compensation-tables-for-injury-and-death. The Ogden tables help actuaries, lawyers and others calculate the lump sum compensation due in personal injury and fatal accident cases.Five ways Covid-19 may change litigation
Litigation, as with the world in general, has changed significantly in 2020. We could not have ever possibly foreseen how during this year we would all have to move rapidly to working remotely and digitally. It may well have accelerated changes in many firms towards digitalisation and a more agile way of working. It is likely that solicitors sitting behind desks each day in a crowded office might be a thing of the past.
The risks associated with gratuitous care
In serious injury cases, there are three options when it comes to private care: gratuitous care, commercial care or a combination of the two (excluding inpatient long-term care which can be funded on a private basis). When an injured person is recovering, it is common for family members to provide gratuitous care; that is care free of charge.
However, often family members need to return to work, they may have children who need their focus and attention and/or they may already be providing care for elderly relatives. It is therefore quite common to seek commercial care at a relatively early stage in an injured person’s recovery if liability (fault) has been established.Opportunity or Threat?
Before the Covid-19 pandemic, people from all sectors and political backgrounds accepted that the current health and social care system wasn’t fit for purpose, nor was it sustainable. It’s an organisationally, culturally and financially fragmented system at odds with itself. It lacks whole system integration, and is often frustrating for people with neurological conditions and their families as they navigate their new lives after hospital. It’s a challenging and conflicted maze for neuro-rehab professionals and providers delivering the best possible services and outcomes for patients and their service commissioners.
Facing a new challenge – treating brain injury during a pandemic
The current pandemic has generated varying levels of anxiety in people around becoming infected or infecting others. In extreme cases, this anxiety can be debilitating. Overwhelming anxiety can lead to withdrawal from others, and in brain injury work settings, can cause staff members to refuse certain duties that make them feel unsafe, which can cause conflict with managers. Feeling a loss of control can be difficult for some, whether that’s at work or at home, and this can be exacerbated by restrictions designed to minimise infection risk. Changes in the workplace include virtual meetings, wearing PPE for client or patient encounters and working remotely.
Capacity for Decisions in Life and Love: Part 2
Georgina Moorhead of Irwin Mitchell focuses on cohabitation and marriage in the second part of her special feature.














