Music therapy and Neurologic Music Therapy are evidenced to provide clear benefits to speech and movement following a brain injury, but occasionally it is not the right therapeutic route for the client.
I recently met a client who had referred themselves for music therapy. Sustaining a traumatic brain injury over 20 years ago, the client underwent rehab including physiotherapy and speech and language therapy and was later deemed to have the capacity to live independently.
During the assessment process, it was clear the client had cognitive deficits such as poor short-term memory, difficulty understanding some of what was being discussed, planning and organising and slurred speech.
After some research and having exhausted other therapies, the client hoped music therapy would further improve movement and speech.
During the first session, we discussed expectations, and shared insight into how music therapy works, timeframes and realistic goals.
A three-way combination of Patterned Sensory Enhancement (PSE) exercises, where music supports the client’s range of movements, basic speech therapy exercises with different sounds and phonemes and Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT) to encourage singing a phrase as opposed to saying it was used during the sessions.
Such exercises bypass the damaged part of the brain that processes speech and moves towards the unaffected part of the brain that processes singing.
While the engagement was high, the client clearly felt self-conscious, and the initial results were not what the client expected. This is understandable, as although these exercises are effective immediately after a brain injury, the client, who was an older adult, felt the tasks were a bit childish.
After discussing the sessions and arming the client with all the facts, the client chose to end therapy. Importantly, the client had the mental capacity to make that decision.
The client chose to begin music therapy and stop it, demonstrating just how important it is for people to be empowered to make their own decisions.
Music therapy works. We know it does, but it is not for everybody, and part of our role is not only to deliver it to the highest standards of therapeutic input, but to know when it’s not right for that client.
Unfortunately, in this case, it was not right, but the client chose to try it, realised it was not for them and stopped the sessions.
All I could do at that point was offer alternative recommendations and wish the client well.
A client-centred approach is about establishing trust and a partnership between practitioners and clients, focusing care on the needs of the individual and ensuring that people’s preferences, needs and values guide clinical decisions and sometimes that means being honest about the right support clients’ needs, even if means finishing a piece of work earlier than planned.
- For more information on the work of Chroma in supporting clients with music therapy, visit here
- Brain injury4 weeks ago
How I got my cockiness back
- Tech4 weeks ago
Clever design, innovation and craftsmanship deliver an outstanding solution for the Edwards family
- Case management3 weeks ago
Making client dreams come true
- News4 days ago
Compassion focused therapy: Lessons from the frontline of brain injury care
- Premium content4 weeks ago
Concussion in sports: new innovations poised to transform the landscape
- Inpatient rehab2 weeks ago
- Professional Insight3 weeks ago
Dealing with ambiguous loss
- Tech4 weeks ago
Introducing the MetaMotus Galileo